Back to main siteBack Contact us
x360Recover

Axcient

Backup and Recovery

A backup you can restore is the only kind that counts

Axcient built x360Recover around two ideas: that backup chains are the usual reason a restore fails, and that nobody should discover a corrupt backup on the day they need it. The product removes the chain and verifies recoverability automatically.


The recovery bottleneck

Most backup failures are discovered during an emergency

Backup software reports success far more often than restores succeed. The gap between those two facts is where the whole category lives.

A chain is only as good as its weakest link

Why traditional incrementals fail

Conventional backup takes one full copy and then a long series of incremental changes. Restoring a given day means reassembling that day from the full copy plus every increment since. If any link in the chain is corrupt or missing, everything after it is unreliable, and the damage is usually silent until somebody tries to use it.

This is why traditional products require periodic new full backups, chain consolidation and reseeding. Those operations consume storage, bandwidth and attention, and each is an opportunity for the chain to break. Axcient's chain-free approach exists specifically to remove that class of failure rather than to manage it better.

Nobody tests restores often enough

An honest admission most organizations share

Almost every organization intends to test its backups. Very few do it at the frequency that would actually give confidence, because a real test means standing up a server somewhere and checking that it boots and that the data inside is intact. That is a half day of work nobody has scheduled.

Automated verification is the practical answer. If every recovery point is booted and checked without anyone being asked, the question changes from whether somebody remembered to test to whether the last check passed. That is a question a report can answer honestly.

Ask when your last successful restore test was, and who performed it. If the answer is vague, the backup is a hope rather than a control.

How the two approaches differ

Where the difference actually shows up

The distinction is not academic. It determines what has to happen on the worst morning of your year.

CHAIN BASED Full inc bad inc inc inc One bad link, and everything after it is unreliable CHAIN FREE Mon Tue bad Thu Fri Each point stands alone. You lose one day, not everything since.
The argument in one picture. Whether it matters to you depends on how much of your recovery plan currently assumes an unbroken chain.
What it includes

The components, and the question each one answers

Axcient publishes a recovery point objective of fifteen minutes and a recovery time objective of under one hour for x360Recover, and states that unlimited data storage and retention are included by default. It also says its direct to cloud deployment can reduce backup costs by up to fifty per cent against appliance-based protection. Those are the vendor's own figures, measured under the vendor's conditions; treat them as the target to hold the contract to rather than as a description of your estate.

Capabilities described by the vendor, expressed as the question a business owner is actually asking.
ComponentWhat it doesAnswers the question
Chain-free backupRecovery points that do not depend on each otherWill yesterday still restore if last month broke?
Automated verificationBoots and checks recovery points without being askedDo we know this works, or do we assume it?
Immutable retentionCopies that ransomware on the network cannot deleteWhat if the attacker reaches the backups too?
Virtual recovery environmentRuns failed systems in the cloud while you rebuildCan people work tomorrow morning?
Direct to cloud optionProtection without a local applianceDo we have to buy hardware for every site?
Work out what downtime would actually cost you →
An honest read

Who this suits, and what to watch for

A strong fit

Servers that stop the business when they stop

Organizations still running servers that matter, on site or in a data centre, where an outage measured in days would be serious: practices, manufacturers, firms with line of business applications that never moved to the cloud. The virtual recovery capability is the part that earns its money, and it is worth evaluating that specifically rather than the backup alone.

A weaker fit

Cloud-only businesses

A company with no servers, whose data lives entirely in Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace, needs a software-as-a-service backup product rather than a business continuity platform. Buying disaster recovery for machines you do not own is straightforwardly the wrong purchase.

Two things to establish

Before signing anything

First, this product is built for and usually sold through managed service providers, and it is also available through ConnectWise. Establish who operates it, who monitors the alerts, and whose contract carries the recovery commitment, because that is the part that matters at two in the morning. Second, agree in writing what recovery time and recovery point your arrangement actually delivers for your systems, rather than accepting the figures in a datasheet, which describe the product under favourable conditions rather than your environment.

In short

Pick a server and ask how long

Choose the system whose loss would hurt most, and ask two questions: how long until it is running again, and how much work would be lost. If nobody can answer with a number, that is the finding.

Test Your Recovery Plan

Get in touch with Your Company

Questions about this solution? Reach us directly.