Back to main siteBack Contact us
Cyber Insurance

Coalition

Cyber Insurance

An insurer that would rather you never make a claim

Coalition writes cyber insurance and monitors the policyholder's internet-facing estate while the policy runs. When it sees an exposure that has historically preceded claims, it tells the customer. The economics are aligned in an unusual way: preventing the incident is cheaper for the insurer than paying for it.

Cyber cover stopped being a formality

For several years cyber insurance was inexpensive and lightly underwritten. Ransomware claims changed that. Premiums rose, capacity tightened, and insurers began asking detailed questions about controls rather than accepting a short declaration.

The practical consequence for most organizations is that the application form has become a security audit. Questions about multi factor authentication, backup immutability, endpoint detection, privileged access and patching cadence are now standard, and the answers determine both the premium and whether cover is offered at all.

This has a useful side effect. The questionnaire is a reasonable summary of the controls that actually reduce loss, assembled by organizations with financial exposure to getting it wrong. Working through it honestly is a worthwhile exercise even for a business that decides not to buy the policy.

An insurance application is now one of the few security assessments somebody else pays to perform on you.

Underwriting informed by what is visible from outside

Coalition assesses the applicant's internet-facing footprint as part of underwriting, and continues to monitor it during the policy term. Exposed services, unsupported software and configurations associated with past claims are identified from the outside, in much the way an attacker would survey a target.

Where something significant appears, the policyholder is notified with the specifics. This is not a report generated annually and filed; it is closer to an alert with a recommended action, issued by an organization that will be paying if the exposure is used.

YOUR ESTATE as seen from outside CONTINUOUS SCAN exposures and known patterns PREMIUM AND TERMS ALERT TO YOU
The same observation sets the price and warns the customer, which is why the incentives point the same way.

What the policy is actually for

Cyber cover is widely misunderstood as a fund that pays a ransom. The more valuable components are the ones that apply whether or not any payment is made.

Incident response, retained in advance
Access to responders, forensic analysts and specialist legal advice, arranged before the incident. Finding those people during a live compromise, at a premium, is how organizations lose their first critical day.
Business interruption
Cover for trading losses while systems are unavailable. For most businesses this exceeds the cost of the technical recovery itself, and it is the part that decides whether an incident is survivable.
Third party liability
Claims arising from the data of customers or partners held at the time of a breach, including the regulatory consequences that follow.
Funds transfer fraud
Losses from fraudulent payment instructions, which remains the most common and most under-insured cyber loss for small and mid sized organizations by a considerable margin.
Before, not during The response arrangements are made when the policy is written. That is the difference between calling a number and searching for a firm that will take your call today.

What changes once cover is in place

The most immediate change is usually not financial. It is that somebody outside the organization is now looking at its exposure and is motivated to mention what they find.

SituationWithout coverWith this model
Exposed service appearsNoticed eventually, or notFlagged by the insurer
Ransomware on Friday nightFind responders yourselfCall the retained team
Two weeks of lost tradingAbsorbed by the businessClaimed under interruption
Fraudulent payment madeUsually unrecoverablePotentially covered
Customer data exposedLegal costs from cash flowLiability cover applies

Read the conditions before relying on the cover

Policies are written against the controls declared on the application. If the declaration says multi factor authentication is enforced everywhere and it is not, the claim is exposed to challenge at the worst possible moment. Answer the questionnaire accurately rather than aspirationally, and fix what the answers reveal.

Insurance also does not reduce the likelihood of an incident, and it should never be bought instead of the controls. It transfers financial consequence, which is a genuine and useful function, and it works best sitting on top of defences that are actually in place rather than substituting for them.

Walk through the questionnaire together →

In short

Work through the application before you need the policy

The questionnaire will tell you which controls are missing, and every one of them is worth fixing regardless of whether the cover is ultimately purchased.

Review Your Cyber Readiness

Get in touch with Your Company

Questions about this solution? Reach us directly.